IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25927 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== RUPAK KUMAR S/o Awdhesh Prasad R/o vill - Heganpura, P.S.- Noorsarai, Distt.- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 20-08-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that in the CTET examination conducted on 07.02.2026, the petitioner was appearing in place of Sunny and Amarjeet was appearing in place of Chanchal. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that it was petitioner who was giving the examination and had not sat in place of Sunny. It is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25927 of 2026(4) dt.20-08-2026 2/3 also submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain his side of the case, perhaps the instant FIR would not have been instituted. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS. 7. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Awdhesh Prasad. 8. However, it is made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner despite Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25927 of 2026(4) dt.20-08-2026 3/3 giving assurance to this Court is not co-operating in the investigation, in that event the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. 9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned police station through the learned Trial Court. 10. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T