Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29146 (KAR)

SMT VANAJAKSHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20197/2026 · 2026-07-15

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010445782026 NC: 2026:KHC:36074 WP No. 20197 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20197 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT VANAJAKSHI W/O H G NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A NO.14, HONNASANDRA, MATTAHALLI BENGALURU NORTH DISTRICT KARNATAKA-562123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYARAJ D S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE THASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA., AGA) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010445782026 NC: 2026:KHC:36074 WP No. 20197 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE OFFICIAL RESPONDENT NO.2 TO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE SITE OR COMPENSATION BY VIRTUE OF HAVING ALREADY ACQUIRED THE GRANTED LAND IN FAVOUR OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING COMMITTEE (APMC) WHICH ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED AND TO PASS NECESSARY ORDERS WITHIN A PERIOD OF TWO (2) MONTHS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is, to direct respondent No.2 to provide an alternative site or compensation in view of acquiring the land belonging to the petitioner for the purpose of formation of Agricultural Products Marketing Committee Building. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010445782026 NC: 2026:KHC:36074 WP No. 20197 of 2026 3. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is open for the petitioner to file a representation to the respondent No.2 seeking redressal of her grievance. If such a representation is made within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, respondent No. 2 shall consider the same within a period of two months thereafter. With these observations, the petition is accordingly disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27