CWP-20904-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 147 CWP-20904-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 Kartik Chandra Maity and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Govind Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sourabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate and Mr. Daksh Saini, Advocate and Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for respondents No.6 and 7. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL , J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.7 – the Secretary, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, to take a decision on the representation dated 28.05.2026 (Annexure P-8) made by the petitioners. 2. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7 have no objection if the petitioners’ above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.14 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-20904-2026 -2- No.7 to take a decision on the aforesaid representation made by the petitioners, by passing speaking order(s) and after granting opportunity of hearing to all affected parties within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 13.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.14 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh