Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2913 (CHH)

SATVEER SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1160/2023 · 2026-01-22

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4065 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1160 of 2023 1 - Satveer Singh Aged About 35 Years Resident of House No. 16 Nalanda Path New River Colony Uliyankadma Thana P.S. Kadma District Purv Sing Bhumi (Jharkhand) (Accused) 2 - Gurmukh Singh S/o Harbhajan Singh Aged About 66 Years Resident Of House No. 16 Nalanda Path New River Colony Uliyankadma Thana P.S. Kadma District Purv Sing Bhumi (Jharkhand) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Police Station Mahila Thana Durg, District- Durg Chhattisgarh. (Prosecution) 2 - Harmeet Kaur W/o Satbeer Singh Aged About 31 Years R/o House No. 367 Road No. 5/a Shanti Nagar Bhilai Tahsil And District - Durg Chhattisgarh. (Complainent) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 23 .01.2026 1. None appears, nor is any representation made, on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition despite repeated calls. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2026.01.24 11:10:13 +0530 2 2. It appears from the record that the instant CRMP suffers from various defects, as pointed out by the Registry, which have not been cured to date. 3. Perusal of the order-sheet dated 15.06.2023 shows that counsel for the petitioners prayed for, and was granted, two weeks’ time to cure the defects before the learned Single Judge; however, the defects remain unaddressed. It further transpires from the order- sheets that the matter was listed twice before the learned Single Judge, yet the defects have not been rectified. 4. Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned State counsel, submits that the trial Court has framed charges against the petitioners vide order dated 27.07.2024, and the matter is listed for recording of prosecution evidence on 20.02.2026. 5. In view of the above, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the present CRMP for want of prosecution and default. 6. Accordingly, the instant CRMP is dismissed for default. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu