Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29117 (KAR)

K RAJU v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/27362/2023 · 2026-07-15

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010645692023 NC: 2026:KHC:36016 WP NO.27362 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.27362 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. K. RAJU S/O KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. SAVITHA DECEASED BY HER LRS. 2. MADHU, D/O K. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS. 3. CHANDAN D/O K. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT: MAJRE DWARANAHALLI VILLAGE, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 562 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARASIMHARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR P1) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TIPTUR SUB-DIVISION, TIPTUR, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 562 101. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010645692023 NC: 2026:KHC:36016 WP NO.27362 OF 2023 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TIPTUR SUB-DIVISION, TIPTUR - 562 102. 3. REVENUE INSPECTOR MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 562 101. 4. SHANTHAMMA W/O J.C. REVANA SIDDIAH, R/AT GANAPATHI HALLI VILLAGE, TAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 560 078. 5. BALARAMU S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, R/AT MAJRE DWARANAHALLI VILLAGE, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. V. CHANDRAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4; RESPONDENT NO.5 - DECEASED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04TH OCTOBER, 2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU DISTRICT IN R.P NO.83/2020; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010645692023 NC: 2026:KHC:36016 WP NO.27362 OF 2023 ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners are challenging the order dated 04th October, 2023 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.1-Deputy Commissioner in R.P. No.83/2020. 2. Heard Sri. Narashimharaju, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner No.1; Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3; and Sri. V. Chandrappa, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, it is forthcoming that the respondents 4 and 5 herein are claiming right over the subject land based on the judgment and decree dated 03rd March, 2012 passed in Original Suit No.135/2009 by the competent Civil Court. On perusal of impugned order dated 04th October, 2023 (Annexure-A) passed in R.P. No.83/2020, it is forthcoming that the respondent No.1- Deputy Commissioner had remitted the matter to the respondent-Revenue Authorities to effect mutation in the name of the respondent No.4 herein in respect of the subject land by - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010645692023 NC: 2026:KHC:36016 WP NO.27362 OF 2023 considering the relevant documents. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that, no interference be called for in this petition as the matter has been already remitted to the jurisdiction Revenue Authorities to take decision in the matter. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4