- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010286232018 NC: 2026:KHC:36665 WP No. 49934 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.49934 OF 2018 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: a) b) c) d) SRI P KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE POOJAPPA SINCE DIED BY HIS LRS SMT. USHA W/O LATE P KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, MRS. ARCHANA K. D/O LATE P. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, MR. GOUTHAM K. S/O LATE P. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, MR. PREETHAM K, S/O LATE P. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE HAVING ADDRESS AT DODDAKANNALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010286232018 NC: 2026:KHC:36665 WP No. 49934 of 2018 AND: 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. a) b) c) SMT. THIMMAKKA W/O LATE MARAPPA SINCE DIED BY HER LRS' SMT. MUNIMARAMMA W/O LATE MARAPPA NAGARAJU S/O LATE MARAPPA AND MUNIMARAMMA NAGARAJU S/O LATE MARAPPA AND THIMMAKKA 3(a) TO (c) HAVING ADDRESS AT: SULIKUNTE VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-562 125. …RESPONDENTS [BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA., FOR R.1 AND R.2; SRI. M.M. PRASHANTHA, ADVOCATE FOR R.3(C)] THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 13.01.2006 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN SC.ST. (A) 66/2004-2005, i.e., ANNEXURE-A AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.08.2004 IN CASE NO.K.SC.ST.19-2002-2003, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 i.e., ANNEXURE-B, ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010286232018 NC: 2026:KHC:36665 WP No. 49934 of 2018 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions to go on with the matter. The petitioners are not co-operating. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14