IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (136) CRA-S-1148-2026 Neeraj ……Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and another ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 14.07.2026 Date of uploading: 14.07.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Khushwant Saharan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral): 1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the order dated 07.03.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, whereby the application for grant of regular bail filed by the appellant has been dismissed in case arising out of FIR No. 248 dated 03.07.2025, registered under Section 127(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to erstwhile Section 346 of the Indian Penal Code [challan under Sections 103(2), 3(5), 338 and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to erstwhile Sections 302, 34, 467 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code)] and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.14 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CRA-S-1148-2026 -2- 2. Faced with the situation that PW—Vinod (last seen witness) and PW- Ajay (FIR-complainant) are yet to be examined as prosecution witnesses, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, seeks to withdraw the present appeal, at this stage. 3. Ordered accordingly. (SUMEET GOEL) July 14, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.14 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh