Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29101 (PAT)

Mansoor @ Mansoor Bashiruddin Shaikh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./58736/2026 · 2026-08-19

Harish Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58736 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2026 Thana- POTHIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Mansoor @ Mansoor Bashiruddin Shaikh Son of Pasiruddin R/O Village- Nimalgaon, P.S.- Pothiya, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Pothiya P.S. Case No.117 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 324(4), 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the BNS. 3. On account of a dispute with respect to plucking of the tea leaves, allegedly this petitioner gave an iron rod blow over the head of the informant’s husband, due to which he sustained serious injuries. There is a further allegation against other accused persons of causing assault and snatching valuables. 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58736 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/3 the genesis of the occurrence is nothing but a trifle in relation to plucking of tea leaves, which resulted into a scuffle leading to some unfortunate injuries. Moreover, the injury which is specifically attributed to the petitioner is reported to be simple in nature. To support the aforesaid contention the injury report of the injurds, including the informant’s husband have been placed on record. The petitioner is carrying fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the Court. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently oppose the bail application. 6. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties and considering the genesis of the occurrence, coupled with the simple nature of injury and the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of A.C.J.M-II, Kishanganj in connection with Pothiya P.S. Case No.117 of 2026, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58736 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 3/3 one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. Utkarsh.k/- (Harish Kumar, J) U