IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59058 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2026 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Gyanchand Sah @ Gyanchandra Sah Son of Rigu Sah Resident of Village- Dumra PS- Karagahar District -Rohtas 2. Ranglal Sah Son of Rigu Sah Resident of Village- Dumra PS- Karagahar District -Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Rina Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Karagahar P.S.Case No.214 of 2026, FIR dated 12.06.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 117(2), 118(2), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 354, 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. Allegation against petitioner No.2 is that he abused and threatened to rape and kill the informant and her daughter. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have clean antecedent. From a bare perusal of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59058 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/3 FIR it appears that due to admitted land dispute the presetn occurrence has taken place and one Title Suit No. 1247 of 2022 is pending between the parties. Although the petitioners are named in the FIR but there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. Specific allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted to the informant but the injury report of the informant suggests that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, injury inflicted upon the informant is simple in nature and one Title Suit No. 1247 of 2022 is pending between the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Karagahar P.S.Case No.214 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59058 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 3/3 BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions:- (I) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. Nitesh/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T