NARENDRA GURJAR @ BALLA S/O HAJARILAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1368/2026 · 2026-03-12
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 291 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 291 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10372] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1368/2026 Narendra Gurjar @ Balla S/o Hajarilal Gurjar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Brisinhwas Dehra, Police Station Kotwali, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.). (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 12/03/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 366/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 331(8), 127(2), 115(2), 140(4), 117(2) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected; He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 01.11.2025; Charge-sheet has been filed; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
[2026:RJ-JP:10372] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1368/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are four criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since 01.11.2025; petitioner-accused is not required for further investigation; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Narendra Gurjar @ Balla S/o Hajarilal Gurjar is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
[2026:RJ-JP:10372] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1368/2026]
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/20