Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29099 (PNJ)

KARANJEET SINGH ALIAS KARAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/13291/2026 · 2026-07-13

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-13291-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 314 CRM-M-13291-2026 Decided on :13.07.2026 Karanjeet Singh alias Karan and others . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Jasdeep Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of FIR No. 31, under Sections 109, 351(2), 190 of BNS read with Section 307,506/149 Cr.P.C. and Sections 25/27 of Arms dated 1.03.2025, registered at Police Station Cantonment, District Amritsar and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 23.10.2025(P-2), effected between the parties. 2. On 11.03.2026 following was recorded by the co-ordinate bench of this Court: “ This is a petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.31, dated 12.03.2025, under Sections 109, 351(2), 190 of BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Cantonment, District Amritsar (Annexure P-1), with all subsequent proceedings RASHMI 2026.07.14 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13291-2026 2 arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 23.10.2025 (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. H.S. Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State. Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and has filed Memo of Appearance, which is taken on record. He admits the factum of compromise entered into between the parties. List on 06.04.2026. In the meantime, the parties are directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court within a period of two weeks from today, for recording of their statements with regard to the compromise. The trial Court is directed to submit a report on or before the next date of hearing containing the following information:- (i) Number of persons arrayed as accused and victim in the FIR; (ii) Whether any accused is declared as proclaimed offender? (iii) Whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence? (iv) Whether the accused persons are involved in any other FIR or not? (v) Whether compromise is complete or partial? (vi) Whether offence has been enhanced after registration of the FIR?” 3. As per the report received from the Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amritsar, in compliance with the directions issued, statements of the victim and accused could not be recorded, as parties did not choose to appear before the said Court. RASHMI 2026.07.14 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13291-2026 3 4. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Rashmi Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RASHMI 2026.07.14 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document