Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29090 (PNJ)

BOOR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/26549/2026 · 2026-07-13

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-26549-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 315 CRM-M-26549-2026 Decided on :13.07.2026 Boor Singh . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Jasdeep Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of FIR No. 223 dated 19.12.2013, under Sections 409, 465, 468, 471 IPC (Sections 316(5), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS) and Section 13 of Prevention of Corruptioni Act, 1988, registered at Police Station Sadar Jalalabad, District Fazilka and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise, effected between the parties. 2. On 12.05.2026 following was recorded by the co-ordinate bench of this Court: “ This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No.223, dated 19.12.2013, registered under Sections 409, 465, 468, 471 of Indian Penal RASHMI 2026.07.14 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26549-2026 2 Code (Sections 316(5), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) BNS) and Section 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, at Police Station Sadar Jalalabad, District Fazilka and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and Mr. Chander Shekhar Sharma, Advocate appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and admit that the compromise has been effected between the parties. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties, they are directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements qua the compromise within a period of 15 days. The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to record the statements of the parties and submit a report on or before the next date of hearing containing the following information:- 1. Number of persons arrayed as accused. 2. Whether any accused is proclaimed offender? 3. Whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence? 4. Whether the accused persons are involved in any other FIR or not? 5. The trial Court is also directed to record the statement of the Investigating Officer as to how many victims/complainants are there in the FIR Adjourned to 13.07.2026” 3. As per the report received from learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalalabad, in compliance with the directions issued, RASHMI 2026.07.14 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26549-2026 3 statements of the victim and accused could not be recorded, as parties did not choose to appear before the said Court. 4. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Rashmi Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RASHMI 2026.07.14 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document