Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29083 (PNJ)

KULWINDER KAUR AND ORS v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/20777/2026 · 2026-07-13

Deepak Sibal, Rupinderjit Chahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.141 CWP-20777-2026 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Kulwinder Kaur and others ....Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. A.S. Sra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. Through this petition, the petitioners seek issuance of directions to the State to convene meeting of the newly elected members of Nagar Panchayat, Nathana so that oath of allegiance can be administered to them as also elections to the post of President and Vice President(s) can be held. 2. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the meeting, as above, shall be convened within two weeks; the entire meeting and the venue from the outside, from all possible angles, shall be got videographed which videography shall include the process of voting by the members by raising of their hands; the CCTV/video-graphed material shall be preserved under the care and custody of Deputy Commissioner, Bathinda for a period of three months and that adequate security, if so required, shall also be made available outside the venue where the afore meetings/elections are going to take place. JYOTI SHARMA 2026.07.14 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CWP-20777-2026 -2- 3. The afore statement made by the learned State counsel satisfies learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE July 13, 2026 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2026.07.14 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh