Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29083 (ORI)

MAMINA SAHU v. TAHASILDAR, ANANDAPUR, KEONJHAR

WP(C)/23509/2026 · 2026-07-29

S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.23509 of 2026 Mamina Sahu ... Petitioner(s) Mr. Satyaban Sahoo, Advoate -Versus- Tahasildar, Anandapur & Ors. …. Opposite Party (s) Ms. Gayatri Patra, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER Order No. 29.07.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The Petitioner, by filing this Writ Petition, has sought for a direction from this Court to the Opposite Party No.1/ Tahasildar, Anandapur to dispose of the representation dated 20.06.2026 vide Annexure-3. 3. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that before approaching this Court, the Petitioner has already ventilated his grievance before the Opposite Party No.1/ Tahasildar, Anandapur by way of representation dated 20.06.2026 vide Annexure-3. He further submits that the said grievance of the Petitioner is still pending. Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 30-Jul-2026 17:24:27 Signature Not Verified 4. He, accordingly, prays that a direction may be issued to the Opposite Party No.1/ Tahasildar, Anandapur for considering the said grievance of the Petitioner. 5. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is of the view that this is a pure case of easementary right of present petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the appropriate authority, ventilating his grievance or file easement suit for possession. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of, accordingly. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Gitanjali