Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29082 (KAR)

J PREMAKUMARI v. SMT CHIKKAMMA

WP/1245/2023 · 2026-07-17

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010028942023 NC: 2026:KHC:36733 WP No. 1245 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.1245 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: J. PREMAKUMARI W/O. DR. S. RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/O.#213, 7TH MAIN, 17TH CROSS A-BLOCK, II STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA MYSURU-570 017 …PETITIONER (BY SRI NISCHAY S. P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI NAGENDRA NAIK R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O. SIDDANAIKA D/O. SANNANAIKA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. CHANDRANAIKA S/O. SANNANAIKA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 3. VASUNAIKA S/O. SANNANAIKA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010028942023 NC: 2026:KHC:36733 WP No. 1245 of 2023 4. SANNANAIKA S/O. LATE CHIKKAGOOLANAIKA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 5. PUTTASIDDAMMA W/O. SANNANAIKA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 6. CHIKKANAIKA S/O. SANNANAIKA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NAGARTHAHALLI VILLAGE JAYAPURA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK-570 026 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3, R4, R5 AND R6 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 06.01.2023 PASSED IN MA NO.4/2023 ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND STAY OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN FDP NO.94/2017 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM TILL MA NO.4/2023 IS FINALLY DECIDED, AS PER ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010028942023 NC: 2026:KHC:36733 WP No. 1245 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel Sri.Nischay.S.P appearing on behalf of Sri.Nagendra Naik.R learned counsel on record for the petitioner, submits that this writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE DS CT:VC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42