DR. BATTI LAL MEENA S/O SHRI KISHAN LAL, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4103/2026 · 2026-04-24
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2908 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2908 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17352] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4103/2026 Dr. Batti Lal Meena S/o Shri Kishan Lal, R/o Narayanpur, Tehsil Gangapur City, Dist. Sawaimadhopur, Presently Residing At Plot No. 268/4, Meena Colony, Maantown, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). (Erstwhile Block Chief Medical Officer, Gangapur City, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (Presently In Central Jail At Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Sharma with Mr. Akshat Sharma Mr. Anoop Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 24/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.53/2026 registered at Police Station CPS Jaipur, District ACB District for offences under Section 7 of PC Act, 1988.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that being a public servant, he demanded a bribe of ₹25,000 in connection with the transfer of the complainant but the petitioner was not the
[2026:RJ-JP:17352] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4103/2026] competent or authorized authority to transfer the complainant. It is further submitted that the petitioner is due to retire from service on 30.06.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 23.02.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Dr. Batti Lal Meena S/o Shri Kishan Lal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/49