RAJESH KARLOPIA v. STATE OF PUNJAB TH. INCHARGE S.H.O., POLICE STATION. AMRITAR AND OTHERS
WP(Crl)/91/2026 · 2026-09-14
Sindhu Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2908 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2908 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 20
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (Crl) No. 91/2026
Rajesh Karlopia
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Sumit Nayyar, Advocate
V/s
State of Punjab and others …..Respondent(s)
Through:-
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 14.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently, some annexures have not been annexed with the petition, as such, he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh. His statement is taken on record.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
Jammu: 14.09.2026 Vishal Khajuria