Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2908 (JK)

RAJESH KARLOPIA v. STATE OF PUNJAB TH. INCHARGE S.H.O., POLICE STATION. AMRITAR AND OTHERS

WP(Crl)/91/2026 · 2026-09-14

Sindhu Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No. 20 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (Crl) No. 91/2026 Rajesh Karlopia …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Sumit Nayyar, Advocate V/s State of Punjab and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER 14.09.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently, some annexures have not been annexed with the petition, as such, he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh. His statement is taken on record. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE Jammu: 14.09.2026 Vishal Khajuria