2026:JHHC:9215 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2474 of 2026 ------ 1. Jakir Ansari, aged about 61 years, Son of Idu Miya @ Idu Miyan, 2. Farida Khatun, aged about 55 years, wife of Jakir Ansari, Both are Resident of Village-Bagodardih P.O. + P.S.-Bagodar, District-Giridih, Jharkhand. …. …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opp. Party CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P. ------ 02/Dated: 01.04.2026 1. It is a case where the prayer for regular bail has been sought for in connection with Bagodar P.S. Case No.310/2025, registered under Sections 80/3(5) of B.N.S. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are absolutely innocent and having not committed any offence. 3. The ground has been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners that it is a case of suicide. 4. It has also been submitted that the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 10.12.2025. 5. While on the other hand, serious opposition has been made by the learned APP for the O.P.-State. 6. It has been submitted that it is a case of demand of dowry and the daughter of the informant has been brutally assaulted by giving electric shock and thereafter by throttling the neck, she succumbed to death. 7. Further, it has also been submitted that the nature of crime is serious and as such, it is not a case for grant of bail. 8. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the first information report, wherefrom it is evident that one Shajad Ansari was solemnized marriage with the deceased, namely, Nagma Khatoon. It has also come that 2026:JHHC:9215 2 within two years of marriage even after birth of male child, the deceased was subjected to torture for want of dowry. 9. It has also been alleged against the petitioners that the assault was also due to electric shock. The reason of death has been shown to be asphyxia. 10. It also appears that the information about the death had been given to the informant after delay of two days. 11. This Court, considering the seriousness of nature of allegation, is of the view that the present bail application is not fit to be allowed. 12. Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 01.04.2026 Samarth/-