1 CWP-21084-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 131 CWP-21084-2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 SWETA KAMBOJ AND OTHERS .....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR , J. (Oral) 1. The present Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for regularization w.e.f. 31.12.2025 on completion of more than ten years of service and grant all consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that he would be satisfied if the demand notice dated 09.05.2026, Annexure P-1, of the petitioner(s) is decided by the respondent(s)/competent authority in the light of judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.1092- PARUL VERMA 2026.07.14 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. 2 CWP-21084-2026 2026 titled as State of Haryana and another v. Saroj Rani @ Saroj Devi, decided on 15.05.2026, Anneuxre P-3, by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to the respondent(s)/competent authority for time-bound consideration and decision of the demand notice dated 09.05.2026, Annexure P-1, of the petitioner(s) by passing a speaking order. 4. Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner(s), the respondent(s)/competent authority is directed to consider the demand notice dated 09.05.2026, Annexure P-1, of the petitioner(s) in light of Anneuxre P-3, after affording him/them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner(s). Needless to say, if the petitioner(s) is/are found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by the respondent. 5. Disposed of, accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 14.07.2026 parul verma Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PARUL VERMA 2026.07.14 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.