MEHNAZ AKHTER v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2742/2026 · 2026-09-14
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2907 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2907 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2742/2026 CM No. 6006/2026
Mehnaz Akhter
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R. P. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate
vs
UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 14.09.2026
1. The grievance projected by the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite she having been found most meritorious in the provisional merit list issued by the respondents in respect of Seasonal Education Volunteer pursuant to advertisement No. ZEOM/26/1282-84 dated 06.08.2026, the respondents are not issuing the engagement order in her favour.
2. It has been submitted that the engagement is seasonal in nature valid only for six months and the delay on the part of the respondents in issuing the engagement order in favour of the petitioner is causing great hardship to her.
3. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents was requested to get the feedback from the respondents about the status of the engagement order of the petitioner. Today, Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG, on instructions, has submitted that after the issuance of provisional merit list, some objections with regard Serial No. 15
2 WP(C) No. 2742/2026
to engagement of the petitioner were received from the local public and the said objections are being verified by the respondents, which has resulted in delay in issuance of engagement order in favour of the petitioner.
4. In view of the limited nature of controversy involved in the present petition, the same can be disposed of by extending appropriate directions to the respondents.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to deal with and dispose of the objections, if any, received against the proposed engagement of the petitioner, most expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date a copy of this
order is made available with the respondents and in case there is no legal impediment in issuance of the engagement order in favour of the petitioner, the respondents shall proceed to issue engagement order in her favour in accordance with law within the aforesaid period.
6.
Disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 14.09.2026 Neha-II NEHA KUMARI 2026.09.14 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document