Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2907 (ALL)

SATVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/2259/2026 · 2026-05-05

Prashant Mishra I

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2259 of 2026 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer to decide the Complaint Case No.238 of 2022 (Satveer Vs. Charan Singh), under Section 138 Ν.Ι. Act, Police Station-Badalpur, District Gautambudhanagar, pending in the court of Special Court Gautambudhnagar, expeditiously. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice. Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides. With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. No. 2 feels aggrieved, he may approach this Court. May 6, 2026 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheer Singh, Ram Bahadur Singh, Suresh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Prashant Mishra-I,J.) Satveer Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad