1 / 2 2026:CGHC:3622 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 694 of 2025 • Kumari Aashifa Khan D/o Late Ikbal Khan Aged About 29 Years Occuiaton - Peon, R/o - Gangrel, P.S. - Rudri, District - Dhamtari, (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Superintendent, Office Of Superintendent, Chhattisgarh State Garage, 6jpwvcx Janta Colony, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 21/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 This Hon'ble Court be further Pleased to issue an appropriate writ to decide the Representation of the petitioner i.e (Annexure P/2) made to the respondent No. 2 on 09.07.2024 within an stipulated time period a directed by this Hon'ble High Court, in the Interest of Justice. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court be further Pleased to issue an appropriate writ to decide the Representation in accordance with law and Provision governing the petitioner, in the Interest of Justice. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court be further pleased to pass such order in favour of petitioner against PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 the respondent as it may deem fit under the facts and circumstances.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was given compassionate appointment on the post of Peon on 13.12.2016 and since then as of now petitioner has completed about more than 8 years. He submits that petitioner has completed the required period of service in the feeder post and has become eligible for consideration of his name for promotion on the post of Assistant Grade-III. However, petitioner has not been promoted till date. Petitioner has submitted representation before Respondent No. 2 on 09.07.2024 (Annexure P-2), however, no decision has been taken on the representation till date. Therefore, direction be issued to Respondent No. 2 to take decision on the pending representation of petitioner at the earliest. 3. Learned State counsel submits in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, she is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, further considering that the claim of petitioner is still pending consideration before Respondent No.2 in the representation submitted by him, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing Respondent No. 2 to take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE