Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29057 (CAL)

SAHA MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/15707/2026 · 2026-07-21

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12 2211..0077..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 15707 of 2026 Saha Mohammad Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Kaustav Chatterjee Mr. Ramij Raja Mondal Mr. D. Saha …for the petitioner Mr. P.K. Samanta Ms. Ratna Das ….for the respondent nos. 4 & 5 Mr. Indrajeet Dasgupta Ms. Aparna Samanta …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioner expresses dissatisfaction with regard to taking steps in completing investigation in Pandua Police Station Case No. 28/2026 dated 10th January, 2026 under certain provisions of BNSS, 2023. Prayer is made in this writ petition for directing the police authorities to expedite investigation. 3. Mr. Dasgupta, learned advocate representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 15th July, 2026 of Officer-in-Charge, Pandua Police Station, Hooghly and same is 2 taken on record. Copies of the communication dated 15th July, 2026 shall be made over to the learned advocates representing petitioner and respondent nos. 4 and 5. 4. It is disclosed in the communication dated 15th July, 2026 that on completion of investigation a charge sheet being No. 245 of 2026 dated 20th May, 2026 was filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate. 5. In view of filing of charge sheet no further order need be passed on this writ petition and same stands disposed of. 6. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate, if so advised. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)