122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20809-2026 Decided On: 13.07.2026 DAYARAM .....PETITIONER(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing official respondents no.1 to 5 to restore the joint agricultural electricity connection to its original position and take action against the erring officials responsible of its illegal shifting in collusion with respondent no.6. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy, if any, in accordance with law. 3. Permitted to do so. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 13.07.2026 JUDGE Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No AMAN DUA 2026.07.14 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document