Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29049 (CAL)

M/S NORTHBROOK JUTE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR. v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

MAT/614/2021 · 2026-07-21

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21st July, 2026 (D/L No.13) Ct. No.4 (SKB) M.A.T. 614 of 2021 In CAN 1 of 2021 M/s Northbrook Jute Company Ltd. and another Versus Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and others Mr. Subhadeep Bhattacharyya, Mr. Bratin Kumar Dey, Mr. Subhankar Banerjee … for the appellants. Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta … for the respondents. 1. The learned advocate for the appellants submits that the subject matter of the present appeal is infructuous as the appellants have discharged their liabilities. He, however, submits that subsequent demands may be raised and for the said purpose, the appeal should be kept pending. 2. We fail to consider how based on an intangible apprehension the appeal or cause of action can be said to survive. 3. In view of such submissions that the subject matter of appeal has become infructuous, we disposed of the appeal. However, it is needless to say that the 2 appellants would be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, if any occasion arises. 4. The application being CAN 1 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)