37. 21.07.2026. Court No.05. (Pritam) WPA 16009 of 2026. Sushanta Kundu -Vs.- State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Prasenjit Debnath, Mr. Amritansu Sengupta. ......for the petitioner. Mr. Partha Chakraborty, Mr. Bijoy Bag. .....for the State. 1. It is submitted by the learned advocate representing the petitioner that victim was recovered on 17th July, 2026 and as such writ petition becomes infructuous. 2. However, State respondents are represented by learned advocate, who has filed a communication dated 20th July, 2026 of Inspector-in-Charge, Nabadwip Police Station and same is taken on record. Copy of the communication dated 20th July, 2026 is made over to the learned advocate representing the petitioner. 3. Since victim is recovered, writ petition is disposed of. 4. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)