Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19705 RSA No. 963 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.963 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1. GANGADHAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE GURUPADADEVARU, R/AT KIRIJIVILLAGE, HUNSUR TALUK
2. MAHESH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O LATE GURUPADADEVARU, R/AT KIRIJIVILLAGE, HUNSUR TALUK …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GURUDATH B S.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1. RANI AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, W/O LATE SHEKAR R/AT BASTHAHALLI VILLAGE, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA MANDYA DIST
2.
MANYA S D/O LATE SHEKARA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, R/AT BASTHAHALLI VILLAGE, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA MANDYA DIST
Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19705 RSA No. 963 of 2024
3. UNIKA D/O LATE SHEKARA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, RESIDING AT BASTHAHALLI VILLAGE, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA MANDYA DIST
4. VEDHAVATHI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, D/O LATE RUDRAIAH, RESIDING AT KIRIJAJI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI HUNSUR TALUK
5. CHANDRA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O LATE RUDRAIAH, RESIDING AT KIRIJAJI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI HUNSUR TALUK
6. PARAVATHAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O ALTE YEDURAPPA RESIDING AT KIRIJAJI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI HUNSUR TALUK …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 6.03.2024 PASSED IN RA.NO.02/2021 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNSUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.11.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.47/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNSUR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19705 RSA No. 963 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
The matter is listed for the eighth time, whereas there are seven objections raised by the registry, which are not yet rectified. It appears the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
RCK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31