IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57267 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2026 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Anil Rai @ Anil Kumar S/O Lal Rai R/O Village- Prithvipur Nahar Tola, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh No. I, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS. 3. The allegation in the FIR is that, on the eventful day, two persons named in the FIR misbehaved with and assaulted the daughter of the informant by using a knife. It is further alleged that when the informant and his family members protested, they were also assaulted by the accused persons. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57267 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner and the informant are co-villagers and were having some dispute between them, and the present case is a false case arising out of the said dispute. He further submits that nothing has happened as alleged in the FIR. He further submits that, thereafter, good sense prevailed upon the parties and they compromised the matter. The informant of the present case has also filed a compromise petition before the court below. He further submits that the injuries sustained are found to be simple in nature and that the petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Having considered the rival submissions of the parties, and in particular the fact that the injuries sustained are simple in nature, the petitioner has clean antecedents, and there has been a compromise between the parties, let the petitioner named above be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57267 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026 3/3 like amount each of the satisfaction of learned CJM, Saran/concerned court, in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. rishabh/- (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) U T