Ramakbal Madesiya @ Ram Ikbal Kandu @ Ram Ekbal Madhesiya v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./56339/2026 · 2026-08-13
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29036 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29036 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56339 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2026 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ramakbal Madesiya @ Ram Ikbal Kandu @ Ram Ekbal Madhesiya S/O Sukhdeo Sah Resident of Village - Banakta Bazar, P.S. - Chaura Kash, District - Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 282 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 249.7 liters liquor was recovered from e-rickshaw and the petitioner was arrested on spot. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56339 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026 2/3 has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the driver of vehicle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 282 of 2026 , subject to the following conditions:- (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial.
In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56339 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026 3/3 bail bonds of the petitioner. saurav/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T