20.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 475. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1361 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 260/2026 dated 04.04.2026 under sections 74/109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/329(4)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Asadul Sk. ……Petitioner. Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya Mr. Asraf Mondal Mr. Poonnug Roy ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Jaydeep Biswas Mr. Priyankar Ganguly …..for the de-facto. Mr. Bhaskar Seth Mr. Utsav Dutta ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 95 days. There was free fight between the family of the petitioner as well as that of the victim. Injuries were sustained by both the sides and criminal cases were registered at the behest of both the parties. Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. There are serious injuries as is reflected from the documents submitted by the defacto complainant. 2 Learned advocate for the State has produced the medical/injury reports as well as the statement of the injured witnesses. I have taken into account the same. Although a case has been made out but further custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Asadul Sk. shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Tehatta. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Nadia without the prior permission of the learned Court. Petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Tehatta Police Station for a period of 6 months. It would be the discretion of the jurisdictional Court either to extend or waive the said condition. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1361 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)