CRM-M-32788-2026 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 284 CRM-M-32788-2026 Decided on : 13.07.2026 Raj Kumar . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Raghav Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG, Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1. In the present case, on 04.06.2026, following order was passed by this Court:- “1. Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile Section 482 Cr.P.C.), seeking a direction for re- investigation in FIR No.152 dated 18.04.2026, registered under Section 140(3) of BNS, 2023 [corresponding to Section 365 IPC], at Police Station Krishna Gate, Thanesar, District Kurukshetra (Annexure P-1), on the allegation that the actual accused persons have been deliberately shielded by the Investigating Officer. Besides, petitioner has also sought quashing of the cancellation report dated 14.05.2026 as being illegal, null and void. 2. It is averred that minor daughter of the petitioner was allegedly kidnapped on 17.04.2026, whereupon FIR in question came to be registered at Police Station Krishna Gate, Thanesar, Kurukshetra. Thereafter, daughter of the petitioner was recovered on 07.05.2026 from the custody of one Aman @ Mangal Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite registration of the FIR and recovery of his daughter, a fair and proper investigation has not been conducted by the Investigating Officer. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Ashwani Bhatia, learned AAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and seeks time to obtain instructions and to file a status JAWALA RAM 2026.07.14 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-32788-2026 - 2 - report/reply, if any. Let requisite copies of the complete paper book be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of the day. 5. Adjourned to 13.07.2026. Let a comprehensive status report be filed, specifically dealing with the allegations raised in the petition and assigning detailed reasons with regard to the investigation conducted so far.” 2. Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 13, 2026 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2026.07.14 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document