ABDUL HOQUE @ ABDUL HAQUE AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/905/2026 · 2026-07-17
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29030 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29030 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17.07.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.931
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.
C.R.M. (A) 905 of 2026
In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Ratua Police Station Case No. 390 of 2025 dated 18.05.2025 under Sections 221/121/121(2)/132/109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 8B of the National Highway Act and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act (G.R. Case No. 1835 of 2025).
And
In Re : Abdul Hoque @ Abdul Haque and others
... Petitioners.
Mr. Amanul Islam, Mr. Arup Sarkar, Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Mr. Gourav Roy
... For the Petitioners.
Mr. Pritam Roy
... For the State.
Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail. Charge-sheet has already been submitted as pointed out by the learned advocate appearing for the State. Having considered the same, I direct that the petitioners would appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail. In case, such a prayer is advanced on behalf of the petitioners, learned jurisdictional court will assess whether custodial detention of the present petitioners are warranted. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. With the aforesaid observations, the application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 905 of 2026, is disposed of.
2 All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)