CHITTARANJAN SENAPATI v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HOME LOAN CENTRE, BHUBANESWAR
WP(C)/18782/2026 · 2026-07-28
K R Mohapatra, M S Sahoo
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29026 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29026 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18782 of 2026
Chittaranjan Senapati …. Petitioner
Mr. Ramdas Achary, Advocate
-versus-
The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Home Loan Centre, Bhubaneswar …. Opp. Party Mr. G.D. Kar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
ORDER 28.07.2026
Order No.
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. This writ application has been filed seeking for the following relief:
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that Hon'ble Court graciously be pleased to:
Admit the Writ Petition; And Issue appropriate direction(s)/order(s) to the Opposite Party Bank to grant reasonable time for liquidation of the remaining outstanding dues in respect of the Reverse Mortgage Loan Account and to consider the petitioner's request for reduction/waiver of interest, penal interest and other charges in accordance with the applicable policies of the Bank in the interests of justice in the prevailing circumstances. And Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
3. Mr. Achary, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meantime, the Petitioner has paid all the dues and the loan p. 2 account of the Petitioner has already been closed.
4. Mr. Kar, learned counsel for the State Bank of India upon instruction also acknowledges the same.
5. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge Amit/Rajesh