Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29026 (ORI)

CHITTARANJAN SENAPATI v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HOME LOAN CENTRE, BHUBANESWAR

WP(C)/18782/2026 · 2026-07-28

K R Mohapatra, M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18782 of 2026 Chittaranjan Senapati …. Petitioner Mr. Ramdas Achary, Advocate -versus- The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Home Loan Centre, Bhubaneswar …. Opp. Party Mr. G.D. Kar, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO ORDER 28.07.2026 Order No. 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. This writ application has been filed seeking for the following relief: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that Hon'ble Court graciously be pleased to: Admit the Writ Petition; And Issue appropriate direction(s)/order(s) to the Opposite Party Bank to grant reasonable time for liquidation of the remaining outstanding dues in respect of the Reverse Mortgage Loan Account and to consider the petitioner's request for reduction/waiver of interest, penal interest and other charges in accordance with the applicable policies of the Bank in the interests of justice in the prevailing circumstances. And Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.” 3. Mr. Achary, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meantime, the Petitioner has paid all the dues and the loan p. 2 account of the Petitioner has already been closed. 4. Mr. Kar, learned counsel for the State Bank of India upon instruction also acknowledges the same. 5. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Amit/Rajesh