Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29022 (CAL)

SUJIT PRAMANIK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1270/2026 · 2026-07-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.07.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.59 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 1270 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No. 41 of 2025 dated 12.01.2025 under Sections 20(b)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In Re : Sujit Pramanik ... Petitioner. Mr. Dipankar Mandal, Mr. Abdul Aziz Mondal ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject-matter of the present case relates to alleged recovery of 137.400 kgs. of Ganja and petitioner is in custody for 1 year 6 months. Petitioner is a driver of the vehicle and owner of the vehicle was granted bail. It has been submitted that there is no possibility of the trial concluding in near future. As such, petitioner prays for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail. Having considered the quantum of recovery in the present case, I am of the view that the petitioner has failed to overcome the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Learned Trial Court would expedite the process of trial as charges have already been framed. 2 The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 1270 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)