Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29009 (PNJ)

JASHANPREET SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/12197/2026 · 2026-07-09

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Jashanpreet Singh Union of India and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 1. ground that petitioner’s reply to the show cause notice was not considered. 2. advanced on behalf of the petitioner are based on disputed questions, which can more appropriately the first instance. 3. which stands dismissed. July 09, 2026 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jashanpreet Singh Versus Union of India and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Shubham Saigal, Advocate, Mr. Jagveer Singh, and Mr. Esh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naman Jain, Advocate, for the respondents. * * * ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE The order cancelling petitioner’s registration is challenged on the ground that petitioner’s reply to the show cause notice was not considered. From the material placed on record, we find that the ar advanced on behalf of the petitioner are based on disputed questions, which more appropriately be examined by the appropriate the first instance. In this view of the matter, we decline to entertain this petition, h stands dismissed. ( ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ACTING July 09, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12197-2026 Date of decision : 09.07.2026 …….Petitioner ...….Respondents JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR , Advocate, or the petitioner. for the respondents. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE The order cancelling petitioner’s registration is challenged on the ground that petitioner’s reply to the show cause notice was not considered. From the material placed on record, we find that the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioner are based on disputed questions, which be examined by the appropriate appellate authority at In this view of the matter, we decline to entertain this petition, ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ( ROHIT KAPOOR ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2026 09.07.2026 …….Petitioner ...….Respondents JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE The order cancelling petitioner’s registration is challenged on the guments advanced on behalf of the petitioner are based on disputed questions, which appellate authority at In this view of the matter, we decline to entertain this petition, NAROTAM DASS 2026.07.10 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment