HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 425 of 2026 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J. Petitioner- complainant has filed this revision petition to challenge the impugned order dated 20.11.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah in Complaint Case No.238 of 2025, titled Mukesh vs. Randheer Singh and others, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 333, 352, 351(2), 316(2), 318(4)j BNS, registered at Police Station Aliganj, District Etah, whereby his complaint has been dismissed. None for the petitioner. No doubt, the impugned order dated 20.11.2025 is revisable, and the statute has conferred the concurrent jurisdiction of revision with the court of sessions as well as the High Court. In the considered opinion of this Court, ordinarily a litigant must avail the remedy of revision before the court of sessions, and only under exceptional circumstances, the revisional jurisdiction of this Court can be invoked. A perusal of the grounds pleaded in the revision petition would show that no exceptional ground is made out by the petitioner-complainant for straightway invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court against the impugned order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Magistrate. Thus, this Court is not inclined to entertain the revision petition, however, a liberty is granted to the complainant-petitioner to file the revision petition before the Court of Sessions, and if it is filed within next three weeks, the same shall be decided on merits. The revision petition is disposed of. May 7, 2026 Raj Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Manoj Bajaj,J.) Mukesh .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad