Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 290 (UTT)

BANK OF BARODA v. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDING OFFICER

WPMB/130/2023 · 2026-03-12

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1649-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 12TH MARCH, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) No. 130 OF 2023 Bank of Baroda …….Petitioner. Versus Debt Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Siddharth Jain, learned counsel Counsel for the respondents : Sri Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. ORDER : 1. Sri Siddharth Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner- Bank, states that the Bank has settled the account with respondent No. 3 and, therefore, he has instructions not to press the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. 3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. 4. The above order has been passed in the presence of Sri Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. _____________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. ___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dt: 12th March, 2026 Rathour PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3aeb1097d17dbb 53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC6179B8E010331B A695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.03.16 16:26:31 +05'30'