Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28995 (PAT)

Ramchandra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./58263/2026 · 2026-08-18

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58263 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2025 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== Ramchandra Yadav S/o Late Indradeo yadav Resident of Village- Govachak, Police Station- Belhar, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Balram Kapri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 22.11.2025 at about 7:30 PM, informant and his nephew were intercepted and assaulted by all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner by means of lathi, danda, rod, etc. as a result of which they sustained injuries. The accused persons are also alleged to have took motorcycle, silver chakti and mobile phone of the informant and threatened them with dire consquences. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Both parties are co-villagers and altercation took place between the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58263 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 parties on the spur of moment over minor dispute in which both sides sustained injuries. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Case and counter case. Case lodged by the petitioner’s side is earlier in point of time. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, case and counter case and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Belhar P. S. Case No. 302 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T