[2026:RJ-JP:17933] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5659/2026 Ajay Singh @ Sachin S/o Ranveer, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Jatolithoon, Police Station Janoothar, District Deeg. (Currently In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5660/2026 Rohtash S/o Veeri Singh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Jatoli Thoon, Police Station Janoothar, District Deeg. (Currently In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh with Mr. Namo Narayan Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Ms. Neetu Singh for Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/04/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.85/2025 registered at Police Station Janoothar, District Deeg for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. [2026:RJ-JP:17933] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5659/2026] 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsels for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. They further submit that in the present matter, no specific act has been attributed to petitioner Rohtash though an act has been attributed to petitioner Ajay but as per the medical report, the injury caused by petitioner Ajay is simple in nature. The petitioners are behind the bars since 25.12.2025 with criminal antecedent of four cases against petitioner- Rohtash in which he is already on bail. Charge- sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Ajay Singh @ Sachin S/o Ranveer and Rohtash S/o Veeri Singh, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with [2026:RJ-JP:17933] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5659/2026] the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/47-48