Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28987 (PNJ)

ASHOK MAHAJAN v. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN HSVP AND OTHERS

CWP/15602/2026 · 2026-07-13

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15602-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-15602-2026 Date of decision : 13.07.2026 Ashok Mahajan ... Petitioner Versus Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. R. D. Gupta, Advocate and Mr.Viresh Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A. G. Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of mandamus directing the Executing Court to decide the execution application no.EA-80-2019 in CC no.229-2019 (Annexure P-3) dated 04.07.2024 titled as “Ashok Mahajan vs. HUDA and others”. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order dated 29.01.2019 has attained finality and the amount which the petitioner is entitled to has been crystallized. Learned counsel for the petitioner has highlighted that for the execution of the said order, the execution petition DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.14 16:49 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-15602-2026 2 was filed in the year 2019 and till date the same is pending. Specific reference has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner to the zimni orders, moreso, the zimni order at page 94 as well as at page 96 to highlight that the respondents-judgment debtors had stopped appearing and no coercive action has been taken against the respondents-judgment debtors. It is further submitted that as per the zimni order at page 92, a request was made by the judgment debtors-respondents for an adjournment and on their request, adjournment was granted. It is submitted that the respondents- judgment debtors are a department of the State of Haryana and thus, it was their duty to comply with the judgment dated 29.01.2019. 3. Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances, moreso, the fact that the execution filed by the petitioner is pending since 2019 and a perusal of the zimni orders, moreso the zimni order at page 94 as well as at page 96 would show that the respondents-judgment debtors had stopped appearing and yet no coercive action has been taken against the said respondents-judgment debtors, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executing Court to decide the execution application no.EA- 80-2019 in CC no.229-2019 (Annexure P-3) dated 04.07.2024 titled as “Ashok Mahajan vs. HUDA and others” as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of the receipt of the certified copy of the present order. 4. Since the respondents are HSVP, Administrator HSVP, Estate Officer HSVP, the State counsel is directed to inform the concerned DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.14 16:49 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-15602-2026 3 authorities of the present order passed and to ensure that they are duly represented before the Executing Court so that the execution proceedings may be brought to its final conclusion. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 13, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.14 16:49 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment