- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1780 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ) C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1781 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ) IN RSA NO.1780/2012: BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. T. VENKATARAVANAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE MURUGAMALLA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. V. VISWANATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI. C. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE MURUGAMALLA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125. (VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R1 IS DELETED) 2. SHRI. T.V. RAMAMAKRISHNA REDDY SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 2(a) SMT. SUJATHAMMA W/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2(b) SRI. HARISH S/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE MURUGAMALLA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125. 2(c) SMT. MAMATHA D/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY W/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT NO.263/1, OLD POLICE STATION, 3RD CROSS BEHIND VASAVI MAHAL, K.R.PURAM BENGALURU-560 036. (AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 06.02.2026) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N.ARUN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2(a to c); VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R1 IS DELETED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.07.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.20/2005 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.01.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.71/2000 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 IN RSA NO.1781/2012: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T. VENKATARAVANAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS 2. SRI. J.V. RAMESH S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YERAS BOTH ARE R/AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE MURAGAMALLA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V. VISWANATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. T.V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 2(a) SMT. SUJATHAMMA W/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2(b) SRI. HARISH S/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE MURUGAMALLA HOBLI IRGAMPALLI POST CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 2(c) SMT. MAMATHA D/O LATE T.V.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY W/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT NO.263/1, OLD POLICE STATION, 3RD CROSS BEHIND VASAVI MAHAL, K.R.PURAM BENGALURU-560 036. (AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 06.02.2026) 2. SRI. C. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YERAS R/AT JUNJANAHALLI VILLAGE MURAGAMALLA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK. (VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R2 IS DELETED,) ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N.ARUN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1(a to c); VIDE ORDER DATED 16.07.2026, R2 IS DELETED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.07.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.62/2006 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.07.2006 PASSED IN O.S.NO.88/2001 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), AND JMFC, AND C/c OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI. THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The appellant and the legal representatives of respondent No.2 have filed the compromise petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. In the compromise petition, it is stated that at the intervention of the well wishers and relatives, the parties have settled the matter. 2. In the compromise petition, the properties which were allotted in favour of the appellant and legal representatives of respondent No.2 are stated in detail and in terms of the compromise, prays the Court to decree the suit of the appellant by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Chintamani in R.A.No.20/2005 dated 25.07.2012 and confirm the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.71/2000 dated 31.01.2005 passed by the Junior Civil Judge and JMFC at Chintamani. 3. The parties have understood the terms of the compromise and the legal representatives of respondents, who - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 are present before the Court also say that prayer sought in the compromise may be recorded. 4. The appellant and legal representatives of respondent No.1 have also filed a compromise petition in connected appeal in R.S.A.No.1781/2012. In the compromise petition, the properties which were allotted in favour of the appellant and legal representatives of respondent No.1 are stated in detail and in terms of the compromise, prays the Court to decree the suit of the appellant by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Chintamani in R.A.No.62/2006 dated 25.07.2012 and confirm the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.88/2001 dated 14.07.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC at Chintamani and parties are one and the same and terms of the compromise are understood by the parties. 5. Hence, the compromise petitions are accepted. 6. Accordingly, the regular second appeals are disposed of in terms of the compromise. - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010363542012 NC: 2026:KHC:36369 RSA No. 1780 of 2012 C/W RSA No. 1781 of 2012 The Registry is directed to draw the decree in terms of the compromise Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18