M/S.MARKON DEVELOPERS v. SRI. S. K. KRISHANA REDDY
MFA/8687/2025 · 2026-07-13
Pradeep Singh Yerur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28976 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28976 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35691 MFA No. 8687 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8687 OF 2025 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
M/S.MARKON DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM INCORPORATED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932]
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.73, 1ST FLOOR, 'KRISHNA' KARTHIK NAGAR, LRDE EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LAYOUT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI BENGALURU - 560 057
PRESENTLY HAVING OFFICE AT MARKON MADHURA GARDENS SY. NO.47 & 49, SORAHUNSE VILLAGE NEAR MADURMBIKA TEMPLE BEHIND KPTCL SUB STATION VARTHUR, BENGALURU - 560 087
REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI. SRINIVASULU KONDAMURI …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SAMMITH S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. S. K. KRISHANA REDDY D/O LATE KONDA REDDY
Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35691 MFA No. 8687 of 2025
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT. SARJAPURA VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. 2. SMT.YASHODHA, W/O LATE S.V GOPAL AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
3. SRI. S.G SHASHI KUMAR, S/O LATE S.V GOPAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
4. SRI. P.V. SRINIVASAIAH @ SRINIVASA S/O. LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
5. SMT. SAROJAMMA D/O. P.V. SRINIVASAIAH @ SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
6. SMT. SHANTHAMMA D/O. P.V. SRINIVASAIAH @ SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
7. SRI. PRADEEP P.S S/O. P.V. SRINIVASAIAH @ SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
8. SMT. SAROJAMMA D/O. LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
9. SMT.KRISHNAVENI D/O. LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RES.PONDENTS 2 TO 9 ARE R/AT. SARJAPURA VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35691 MFA No. 8687 of 2025
10. S.K. CHANDRA REDDY S/O. S.C. KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
11. SRI. CHETHAN C. REDDY S/O. S.K. CHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
12. KUMARI. MONISHA C. REDDY D/O. S.K. CHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS
DEFENDANT NO. 12 SINCE MINOR REP. BY HER FATHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.10 SRI. S.K. CHANDRA REDDY RESPONDENT NO.10 TO 12 ARE R/AT. BEHIND CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE, SARJAPURA VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. 13. SMT.SHANTHAMMA W/O. LATE S.K. NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
14. SRI.S.N HARISH S/O. LATE S.K NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
15. SRI. ARJUN S/O. LATE S.K.NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.
13 TO 15 ARE R/AT NO.297, GANGA NAGAR BYADARAPALLI, ZUJJAVADI HOSUR TALUK KRISHNA GERRI DISTRICT TAMIL NADU 635 126
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35691 MFA No. 8687 of 2025
16. SMT.S.K.PADMA D/O.LATE S.C.KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO. 6, 11TH MAIN 4TH CROSS, MSR LAYOUT OPP LAKSHMIPATI INDUSTRY HONGASANDRA BENGALRU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 068
17. SMT.S.K.BHAGYA LAKSHMI D/O. LATE S.C. KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO. 229, 9TH MAIN 5TH 'A' CROSS, HONGASANDRA BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 068 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SURESH S., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 TO R17 IS DISPENSED WITH V.O.D 22.01.2026)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.08.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO. 1 IN O.S.NO. 887/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, ALLOWING IA NO. 1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35691 MFA No. 8687 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that in view of the amendment made to the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, the impugned order passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Anekal will have to be agitated before the District Court as provided under Section 19 of the Act.
2. Placing the submission of learned counsel, this appeal is disposed of as not maintainable. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to approach the appropriate forum by filing appropriate proceedings. Time spent herein shall be condoned, if any such proceedings are filed. All certified copies filed by the appellant shall be returned to the learned counsel for the appellant forthwith.
3. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31