Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-20536-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
125
MANJIT SINGH
STATE OF PUNJAB
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:- Ms. R. K. Grewal for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
The petition has been filed, respondents no.1 to 4 question, owned and possessed by him.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there is no restraint on the petitioner to cultivate the land in question, as the order dated 21.01.2026 passed by Fatehgarh Sahib v. Manjit Singh alienating the suit property by way of sale and mortgage. allowed to cultivate his land. has filed a complaint against the petitioner inquired into and a notice dated the petitioner to be present before the Division, Bassi Pathana 2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP
Date of Decision:
MANJIT SINGH
Versus
PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Ms. R. K. Grewal, Advocate (Through Video Conferencing) for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed, inter alia respondents no.1 to 4 not to restrain the petitioner from cultivating the land in owned and possessed by him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there is no on the petitioner to cultivate the land in question, as the order dated passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Fatehgarh Sahib, in a civil suit filed by respondent no.5 Singh, restrains the petitioner (defendant therein) alienating the suit property by way of sale and mortgage. allowed to cultivate his land. Respondent no.5 complaint against the petitioner before the Police nquired into and a notice dated 06.06.2026, Annexure P the petitioner to be present before the Deputy Superintendent of Police Bassi Pathana, in that regard.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20536-2026
Date of Decision: 09.07.2026
…Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA (Through Video Conferencing) Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. inter alia, seeking a direction to not to restrain the petitioner from cultivating the land in
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there is no on the petitioner to cultivate the land in question, as the order dated learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), respondent no.5 titled Devender Singh the petitioner (defendant therein) only from alienating the suit property by way of sale and mortgage. But he is not being Respondent no.5 is a retired Police Officer and before the Police, which is being , Annexure P-6, has been issued to Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub
direction to not to restrain the petitioner from cultivating the land in
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there is no on the petitioner to cultivate the land in question, as the order dated , Devender Singh from But he is not being Officer and , which is being , has been issued to , Sub AMAN DUA 2026.07.14 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document
CWP-20536-202
3.
Learned State counsel, on instruction filed by respondent no.5 has been 29.06.2026, because the dispute arising between the parties respondent no.5 learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)
4.
Considering the facts aforementioned, this Court finds no ground to entertain
09.07.2026 Ad
2026
-2-
Learned State counsel, on instruction by respondent no.5 has been inquired into , because the dispute arising between the parties respondent no.5 is of civil nature which is already pending adjudication learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Considering the facts aforementioned, this Court finds no ground to entertain the petition and
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the complaint nquired into and consigned to record on , because the dispute arising between the parties - petitioner and civil nature which is already pending adjudication before learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fatehgarh Sahib. Considering the facts aforementioned, which are not in dispute, the petition and it stands disposed of.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
submits that the complaint and consigned to record on petitioner and before , ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.14 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document