20.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.905. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (A) 933 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chinsurah Women Police Station case no. 09 of 2026 dated 16.01.2026 under Sections 69/316(2)/318(4)/351(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Debanjan Das. ……Petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Kumar Singh .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Pritam Roy Mr. Mukesh Kr. Gupta ……for the State. Service effected on behalf of the State upon the private opposite party be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner and the victim are matured enough to understand the consequences of their act and actions. As such even if the accusations made against the petitioner is believed to be true, so far as violation against the will of the victim is concerned that is not applicable in the present case. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 off the BNSS. I have taken into account the materials appearing against the present petitioner, the age of the victim which is 34 years and the age of the present petitioner also, having considered the overall 2 circumstances, I am of the view that custodial detention of the present petitioner may not be warranted in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall furnish bond subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the charge-sheet has not been submitted in the present case and the investigating is still in progress, petitioner shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge once in a fortnight or as and when called for till the charge-sheet is submitted. Accordingly, CRM (A) 933 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)