Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28953 (CHH)

ABHINIT UPADHYAY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3831/2026 · 2026-07-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010277122026 2026:CGHC:31636 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3831 of 2026 1 - Abhinit Upadhyay S/o Shri Ram Bishal Upadhyay Aged About 44 Years R/o 218, Samta Colony Raipur District Raipur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur C.G. 2 - Municipal Corporation Raipur Through The Commissioner Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3 - Pawan Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Bhimsen Agrawal Age Not Known To Petitioner, R/o Samta Colony Raipur District Raipur C.G. 4 - Joint Director Town And Country Planning, Raipur Division District Raipur C.G. 5 - Samta Grih Nirman Sahakari Samti Maryadit Through The Authorized Officer, Samta Colony Raipur District Raipur C.G. 6 - Zone Commissioner Zone No. 7, Of Municipal Corporation Raipur Agrasen Chowk Municipal Corporation Complex, Beside Manglam Hotel Raipur District Raipur C.G. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 For State :- Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. For Respondent-Municipal Corporation:- Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 24.07.2026 1. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after removing the anomalies/defects in the present petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. No order as to costs. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha