Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2895 (UTT)

POWER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY LABOUR

WPMS/2154/2016 · 2026-03-23

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.728 of 2026 Sangeeta Das …………Petitioner Vs. Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority and another ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Yogesh Sethi, learned counsel, through video conferencing holding brief of Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Pawan Sanwal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for respondent no.1. 3. Mr. Devendra Pant, learned S.C. for the State/respondent no.2. 4. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 07.02.2026, annexure no.9 to the writ petition, whereby restrictions have been imposed upon the petitioner not to sale and purchase the property in-question. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) pray for and are granted four weeks’ time for filing counter affidavit(s). 6. List this case on 13.05.2026. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.03.2026 SK