V. KRISHNA @ KRISHNA NAGWANI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
MCRC/71/2026 · 2026-01-06
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2895 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2895 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:1088
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 71 of 2026 • V. Krishna @ Krishna Nagwani S/o Vijay Kumar Nagwani Aged About 19 Years R/o Dayanand Nagar, Katora Talab, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
... Applicant versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Telibandha, District- Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. Aishwarya Diwan, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 07.01.2026
1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 700/2025, registered at Police Station – Telibandha, District – Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2026.01.08 17:29:43 +0530
2
2. The case of the prosecution, is that on 05.11.2025 at around 4:00 P.M. complainant namely Atit Jha working in a Pathology lab went to collect the blood sample in jalvihar colony near Telibandha Marin Drive and stopped his vehicle in a open place for washroom were two persons came from behind and started searching the bag of the complainant and snatched Rs 400/- bracelet, earphone and transferred Rs 3200/- in there QR code. On the basis of aforesaid story, offence under section 309(4), 3(5) of BNS act. has been registered by the police station Telibandha, District- Raipur (C.G.) in crime no.700/2025, dated on 06.11.2025. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and there is no criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. The applicant is in jail since 07.11.2025 and trial is likely to take quite long time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there is no criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, and the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record. 6.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the
3 case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that there is no any criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, the applicant is in jail since 07.11.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application. 7. Let applicant, V. Krishna @ Krishna Nagwani involved in Crime No. 700/2025, registered at Police Station – Telibandha, District – Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of
4 BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice vaishali