Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2895 (ALL)

KAJAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/986/2026 · 2026-05-05

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 986 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Heard Shri Mahadeo Singh Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere, harass or cause any interference in the peaceful marital life of the petitioners and further direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to provide adequate protection to protect their life and liberty from respondent No.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this petition and wants liberty to file a fresh petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. May 6, 2026 Ishan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahadeo Singh Chandel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Kajal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad