Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28949 (CHH)

HARSH SIDAR @ BITTU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/6698/2026 · 2026-07-23

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010261702026 2026:CGHC:31728 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6698 of 2026 1 - Harsh Sidar @ Bittu S/o Shri Santosh Sidar Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Sukhda, Police Statoin Dabhra, District- Sakti (C.G.) Pin -495668 2 - Gulshan Bareth S/o Shri Lakhan Bareth Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Sukhda, Police Statoin Dabhra, District- Sakti (C.G.) Pin -495668 ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Malkharoda, District- Sakti (Chhattisgarh) ... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicants : Mr. Uday Singh Bhadoriya, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board 24.07.2026 1. The applicants have preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), for grant of regular bail, as they have been arrested in connection with different Crime Nos. 178/2026, 179/2026, 181/2026, 182/2026, 183/2026 and 184/2026, registered at Police Station Malkharoda District Sakti, for the offence punishable KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 under Sections 303(2), 324(3), 112 and 3(5) of BNS. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application. 3. Learned State counsel appearing for the Non-applicant/State has no objection to the said prayer. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer is allowed. Consequently, the present bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Kunal