CWP-8747-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-8747-2026 Date of decision : 13.07.2026 Sat Narain ... Petitioner Versus Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr.Harish Plaha, Advocate, Mr.Ankit Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Ajay, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A. G. Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents to decide the legal notice-cum-representation dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had duly applied under the oustees scheme on 30.06.2025 and the said application was made within the prescribed time along with requisite bank challan bearing no.ADC-0077847 and upon successful submission the application receipt was generated under application no.OUST0000002748. It is submitted that on the same date i.e., 30.06.2025, the relatives of the petitioner had also submitted two applications through online process and the applications of the said relatives have been accepted and processed by DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.14 16:49 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-8747-2026 2 the department but the application of the petitioner has not been processed in spite of repeated requests. It is submitted that vide communication dated 18.12.2025 it has been cryptically stated that the application of the petitioner was not found to have been finally submitted and no detailed reason has been given so as to on what basis the application of the petitioner has not been considered. It is further submitted that for the redressal of the said grievance, the petitioner had given a detailed representation dated 09.01.2026 giving all the abovesaid details and other details and has stated that the petitioner would be satisfied at this stage, in case the Estate Officer- respondent no.2 considers the said representation in accordance with law in a time bound manner and pass a speaking order on the same. 3. Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 09.01.2026 submitted by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today and to pass a speaking order thereon. Needless to say that in case the pleas raised by the petitioner are found meritorious, then, necessary relief be granted to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 13, 2026. JUDGE Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.14 16:49 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment